Comments on: JSF + AJAX = ADF.Faces.NEXT

By: IT-eye » ADF Faces Rich Client Components

IT-eye » ADF Faces Rich Client Components — Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:22:28 +0000

[...] The ADF.Faces.NEXT posting on this blog gets a lot of traffic, many people ask for more info. Shay Shmeltzer just posted an entry on his weblog which will be of interest to them: ADF Faces Rich Client Demo and Other AJAX Thingies. He links to a viewlet which demos Oracle’s upcoming AJAX enabled JSF components used for a webstore: ADF Faces Rich Client – Sneak Preview. Btw, Oracle internally refers to these components as the “Rich Client Components”, not ADF.Faces.NEXT. Sphere: Related Content [...]

By: Andrej Koelewijn

Andrej Koelewijn — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:27:41 +0000

I don’t think i understand your question. Are you saying that adf faces calls ejbs different than normal JSF pages?

By: Ganesh Kumar K

Ganesh Kumar K — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:52:18 +0000

my question is using ADF faces with EJB (generally JSF with EJB we are facing the home interfance calling number of times. is it rectified in ADF faces

By: IT-eye Weblog » Jdeveloper Statement of Direction

IT-eye Weblog » Jdeveloper Statement of Direction — Tue, 17 Oct 2006 12:15:30 +0000

[...] ation, ADF Faces, will have AJAX and Rich Client support (I blogged about this last year: JSF + AJAX = ADF.Faces.NEXT). The current release of ADF Faces doesn’t really do [...]

By: Andrej Koelewijn

Andrej Koelewijn — Wed, 04 Oct 2006 07:27:44 +0000

No official news, as far as i know. But Oracle OpenWorld starts in two weeks, I expect more info then.

By: Olivier DESMARS

Olivier DESMARS — Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:39:32 +0000

Any news from ADF Faces .Next ? Is it still under developpement, soon released or just a vaporware ?

I expect a lot from this new framework to get rid of my old Forms 6i applications !

By: Rami AL-SAHHAR

Rami AL-SAHHAR — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:51:38 +0000

Thanks Koelewijn for your quick reply,

My question mainly was about Oracle JDeveloper and its AJAX road map,I can see JDev. still cooking AJAX to be released later on, I hope it can come up with it very soon.

Regards
Rami

By: Andrej Koelewijn

Andrej Koelewijn — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:06:53 +0000

ADF Faces components are standard JSF components which means you can use them with other JSF components. But this doesn’t mean you can have ADF Faces components which will automatically update when a non ADF Faces JSF component changes.

I think Oracle will release an AJAX enabled ADF Faces version. The current ADF Faces components are already AJAX enabled, but the next version will probably have more extensive AJAX support.

There currently is no AJAX standard. The dojo framework is being used quite a lot, but it’s not a standard. There are some other good AJAX frameworks. There is also no standard AJAX architecture yet. Some frameworks are serverless frameworks (Google Web Toolkit for example), other frameworks do most of the work on the server.

I think it’s too early to take AJAX decisions, people are still experimenting. Just pick a framework and see if it works for you.

By: Rami AL-SAHHAR

Rami AL-SAHHAR — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:53:22 +0000

Hi guys ,

i’ve attended some Oracle ADF workshop and the it was great , I raised the AJAX quesiotn with JDeveloper and the Oracle guys replied with a nice “Oracle ADF -Ajax” Demo but they said the demo is for inernal team only and will be available in June 2006. we are almost in mid of June , no news? Is Oracle JDevelop coming with open standard for AJAX components? or will be Oracle specific AJAX development framework?

I need a concrete answer please , we are taking decisions.

Thanks
Rami AL-SAHHAR

By: Andrej Koelewijn

Andrej Koelewijn — Fri, 09 Jun 2006 11:29:19 +0000

Jdevelope is most productive if you use the default ADF Faces/JSF controller, ie. use faces-config.xml to define navigation rules. Why do you want to use a different MVC framework?
You can use EJBs with ADF Faces. The current version of JDeveloper (10.1.3) has support for EJB 2.1 and a draft version of EJB3. The next release (10.1.3..1) will have support for EJB3 final.
If you can, i would use EJB3. It’s much better than 2.1.